I can actually answer one of the questions you asked about the bank selling for a loss and staying in business. They wnt to take a loss and go into foreclosure because they have a ’special’ deal with the FDIC that insures them(pays them) for 80% of the loss from the ORIGIONAL loan price, the price the origional borrower who is being foreclosed on paid. And I would almost guarantee that the ‘third party investor’ is probably A major bank(Goldman;JP MOrgan etc…) who owns US Bank. Crazy!
Not sure on the procedure for Australia but the U.S. is as follows:
To be eligible for the bar in the U.S. as a foreign attorney, a person must have completed 12-24 months of law school at an accredited law school in the U.S and obtained a J.D. (Jurist Doctor). The 12-24 months depends on if you have completed an LL.B. or an LL.M. in the U.K. The other prerequisites for the bar exam include a Professional Course with the state's Bar Association and completion of the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE), which a minimum score is needed to pass. The score depends on the State.
Once the above is completed you are then eligible to sit the Bar Exam in your chosen state and again, a minimum score is required to pass. Once you do pass, you then take the oath and apply to the licensing body of the state.
The only state in the U.S. which allows LL.B. holders to sit the bar exam is New York and thus, that is where many go, but you will still be a lawyer with an LL.B. in a J.D. world and will find difficulty in seeking employment and will not be eligible to work outside of the State of New York.
To apply to a law school in the U.S. you will need to take the LSAT (Law Schools Admission Test). The LSAT is only given four times a year (June, October, December and February) and it is possible to take the LSAT in the U.K.
With regards to your law degree in the U.K, when you apply to a law school in the U.S. you will submit your school transcripts for evaluation using the LSAC JD Credential Assembly Service. This is so that your foreign transcripts can be evaluated and the U.S. equivalence of them can be determined to see if you are eligible for law school and if you are, then which year of law school you will be entering.
Don't forget that to study in the U.S. at law school you will need an F1 (student) visa and another key note to remember is this; when you graduate with a J.D, pass all of the prerequisites for the bar, pass the bar exam, take the oath and are finally licensed, you will still not be legally permitted to work without the required H1B visa, for which a company must sponsor and petition you for.
American criminal law is based on English law, so I think you will find many similarities, at least at their roots. American common law especially will mirror the English, so concepts like murder, trespass, rape will be understandable. However, US statutory law has probably diverged from the English, so you'll have learn that in order to practice criminal law. I would suggest studying law in UK and then studying for a one-year LLM (masters of law) in the US.
You don't say who "he" is but I suppose you're speaking about Obama and if he was really born in Kenya he would be an American citizen if his mother was but that also shows that he is a liar about something else.
No that is not true. But there are a lot of crazy laws on the books that make you scratch your head in amazement. In Ocean City NY it is illegal for a man to go out in public topless. In Topeka Kansas it's against the law to serve wine in teacups. Here is a website with other stupid laws:
It is a myth that money is based on gold. Money is based on a faith in the credit of a nation. In Canada, money can be created out of nothing by the Bank of Canada or the private banking system. For example, a private bank agrees to loan you $30,000. The loan officer instructs a teller to type ‘30,000′ into your bank account. Prior to the teller typing that $30,000 into your account it did not exist. The money is not based on deposits in the bank. Now you owe it as debt + interest.
you barrow money, you don’t pay the money back ? you get forclosed! don’t look to blame someone else! This country has become a nation of blame, blame someone other than yourself
You, I and corporations do not have a choice, we must borrow from the private banking system. The Canadian government has a choice and can borrow interest free money from the Bank of Canada (BOC). The BOC can offer provincial and municipal governments funding at rates that are well below private bank rates. All G-8 countries, on behalf of their citizens, choose to borrow as debt and at substantial interest from private banks. More than half of our tax dollars services interest on the debt.
I cannot speak specifically to the Child Exploitation Material (CEM) situation in the US situation; but you have to realise that yes the internet is a big place, but more importantly it is a place without borders. Policing is limited to a jurisdiction.
What you will find is that more and more Law Enforcement Agencies are sharing information and more and more peddlers of CEM are being located and more importantly more producers of CEM are being located and prosecuted for both the trafficking of CEM as well as the contact offences being committed against children.
Ultimately the priority of investigators in this area is to identify and locate the children being abused so that they can be rescued. Yes catching those that trade the images is an added bonus but we have keep our focus on finding those children at risk.
Part 1: “If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world… -Times of London editorial
OK, family meeting folks, survival mode, no more buying shit from China, cancel all insurance policies, walk bye bye credit cards (fico: huge fraud), walk and bye bye underwater mortgage, fuck the banks. Hey,…it’s just a pragmatic family business decision. Got the idea from Wall Street too big to fail banks, sob’s got my Tarp money and all, so screw them. Start me a family weed/veggie garden, gunsNroses, pop me a cool one,…Oh and Fuck the Census!
You can't. You would have to know American Law. Contact the American Bar Association. Call a law school in any state. Such as Pepperdine in California.
How can you practice American Law if you only know Egyptian law? lol Not going to get many clients here are you? lol
Banks are frauds.
But did the Oval, Senate, House
in a cover up and a accessory to a National banking fraud scheme….
There all felons in the banks and Oval, Senate, and House.
“My agency in promoting the passage of the National Banking Act was the greatest financial mistake in my life. It has built up a monopoly which affects every interest in the country.” -Salmon P Chase
“Putting Fiscal Year 2009s $9 trillion deficit another way, 17% of Americas private wealth, accumulated over a period of 235 years, was wiped out by just one years worth of government deficit spending insanity”. -Stewart Dougherty
Part 2: “…The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” -Times of London editorial in response to US President Abraham Lincoln’s position that the USA create, issue and circulate its own currency
No the trails, if they are from inclusive crimes, are all held together. The prosecutor may not decide to even charge with the misdemeanors. lets say the bad guy trespassed and then killed a victim. The prosecutor would not even go with the trespass, unless state law made the punishment higher for the killing if there was another crime.
In your example the charge of UUW is a lesser included offense to the armed robbery. They likely would be charged with the misdo but the trail would be at the same time, even if there were multiple victims, the bank, the teller and the customers.
If all the crimes happened at the same time then the trials for the lesser included offenses (i.e. shooting someone has the lesser included offense of an assault) or even separate misdemeanors (i.e. the bad guy robs victim A and on walking out slaps victim B), are all together.
If for example the crimes were separated by time, place and victim then the trials are separate, no matter if misdo or felony
If I understand your question correctly, this should be of a lot of service. Its in PDF format, but it highlights many different facility influences in detail. Hope this helps.
I've been in law enforcement for almost two decades. I have yet to use any aspect of the Patriot Act in my crime fighting endeavors. Much of what police encounter on a daily basis is dealt with using laws, case laws, policies, and practices that have been in use way before the Patriot Act. The left likes to scream Patriot Act anytime someone raises a question about law enforcement they don't agree with or understand. For example, post a question on here asking about warrantless vehicle searches and some uninformed person will surely start sobbing about the Patriot Act when in fact the question concerns the Carroll Doctrine. The Carroll Doctrine stems from a US Supreme Court ruling from the 1920's not the Patriot Act. I can talk about US v. Carroll until the proverbial cows come home and the Patriot Act sect will never listen.
There are always advertisements for scholarships for UK graduates to do a post grad degree in the US. You should go to your university careers office for more information. Demand for these are very high from what I hear so be prepared for an interview and things like that
February 22nd, 2010 - 06:55
I can actually answer one of the questions you asked about the bank selling for a loss and staying in business. They wnt to take a loss and go into foreclosure because they have a ’special’ deal with the FDIC that insures them(pays them) for 80% of the loss from the ORIGIONAL loan price, the price the origional borrower who is being foreclosed on paid. And I would almost guarantee that the ‘third party investor’ is probably A major bank(Goldman;JP MOrgan etc…) who owns US Bank. Crazy!
February 22nd, 2010 - 07:15
Yes, you call that fraud.
February 22nd, 2010 - 07:01
these might help?
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/people/A0859499.html
http://www.historicaltextarchive.com/books.php?op=viewbook&bookid=36&cid=7 (maybe try http://www.historicaltextarchive.com/books.php?op=viewbook&bookid=36 too)
http://www.lva.lib.va.us/whoweare/exhibits/marshall/index.htm
good luck on the report =) sry, these sites probably won't help much…
February 22nd, 2010 - 08:14
Not sure on the procedure for Australia but the U.S. is as follows:
To be eligible for the bar in the U.S. as a foreign attorney, a person must have completed 12-24 months of law school at an accredited law school in the U.S and obtained a J.D. (Jurist Doctor). The 12-24 months depends on if you have completed an LL.B. or an LL.M. in the U.K. The other prerequisites for the bar exam include a Professional Course with the state's Bar Association and completion of the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE), which a minimum score is needed to pass. The score depends on the State.
Once the above is completed you are then eligible to sit the Bar Exam in your chosen state and again, a minimum score is required to pass. Once you do pass, you then take the oath and apply to the licensing body of the state.
The only state in the U.S. which allows LL.B. holders to sit the bar exam is New York and thus, that is where many go, but you will still be a lawyer with an LL.B. in a J.D. world and will find difficulty in seeking employment and will not be eligible to work outside of the State of New York.
To apply to a law school in the U.S. you will need to take the LSAT (Law Schools Admission Test). The LSAT is only given four times a year (June, October, December and February) and it is possible to take the LSAT in the U.K.
With regards to your law degree in the U.K, when you apply to a law school in the U.S. you will submit your school transcripts for evaluation using the LSAC JD Credential Assembly Service. This is so that your foreign transcripts can be evaluated and the U.S. equivalence of them can be determined to see if you are eligible for law school and if you are, then which year of law school you will be entering.
Don't forget that to study in the U.S. at law school you will need an F1 (student) visa and another key note to remember is this; when you graduate with a J.D, pass all of the prerequisites for the bar, pass the bar exam, take the oath and are finally licensed, you will still not be legally permitted to work without the required H1B visa, for which a company must sponsor and petition you for.
Below are some links to help you.
February 22nd, 2010 - 16:50
yeah, the problem is people are raise believe what other people say,, but the fact is a men/women is not what they say, is what they do
February 22nd, 2010 - 13:44
American criminal law is based on English law, so I think you will find many similarities, at least at their roots. American common law especially will mirror the English, so concepts like murder, trespass, rape will be understandable. However, US statutory law has probably diverged from the English, so you'll have learn that in order to practice criminal law. I would suggest studying law in UK and then studying for a one-year LLM (masters of law) in the US.
February 23rd, 2010 - 00:30
fuck this I am going to cash.
February 23rd, 2010 - 02:50
I wondered about US Bank when they started popping up like mushrooms. I appreciate you sharing this with us !
February 23rd, 2010 - 02:41
You don't say who "he" is but I suppose you're speaking about Obama and if he was really born in Kenya he would be an American citizen if his mother was but that also shows that he is a liar about something else.
February 23rd, 2010 - 09:04
No that is not true. But there are a lot of crazy laws on the books that make you scratch your head in amazement. In Ocean City NY it is illegal for a man to go out in public topless. In Topeka Kansas it's against the law to serve wine in teacups. Here is a website with other stupid laws:
http://tjshome.com/dumblaws.php
February 23rd, 2010 - 14:24
This sounds like a ponzi scheme to beat all ponzi schemes…
February 23rd, 2010 - 17:02
It is a myth that money is based on gold. Money is based on a faith in the credit of a nation. In Canada, money can be created out of nothing by the Bank of Canada or the private banking system. For example, a private bank agrees to loan you $30,000. The loan officer instructs a teller to type ‘30,000′ into your bank account. Prior to the teller typing that $30,000 into your account it did not exist. The money is not based on deposits in the bank. Now you owe it as debt + interest.
February 23rd, 2010 - 21:56
you barrow money, you don’t pay the money back ? you get forclosed! don’t look to blame someone else! This country has become a nation of blame, blame someone other than yourself
February 24th, 2010 - 02:15
You, I and corporations do not have a choice, we must borrow from the private banking system. The Canadian government has a choice and can borrow interest free money from the Bank of Canada (BOC). The BOC can offer provincial and municipal governments funding at rates that are well below private bank rates. All G-8 countries, on behalf of their citizens, choose to borrow as debt and at substantial interest from private banks. More than half of our tax dollars services interest on the debt.
February 24th, 2010 - 06:34
I cannot speak specifically to the Child Exploitation Material (CEM) situation in the US situation; but you have to realise that yes the internet is a big place, but more importantly it is a place without borders. Policing is limited to a jurisdiction.
What you will find is that more and more Law Enforcement Agencies are sharing information and more and more peddlers of CEM are being located and more importantly more producers of CEM are being located and prosecuted for both the trafficking of CEM as well as the contact offences being committed against children.
Ultimately the priority of investigators in this area is to identify and locate the children being abused so that they can be rescued. Yes catching those that trade the images is an added bonus but we have keep our focus on finding those children at risk.
just a little food for thought.
February 24th, 2010 - 12:16
we are not free. we are not an independent nation. we are not free from the bank of england
February 24th, 2010 - 15:36
Part 1: “If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world… -Times of London editorial
February 24th, 2010 - 17:27
February 25th, 2010 - 01:55
OK, family meeting folks, survival mode, no more buying shit from China, cancel all insurance policies, walk bye bye credit cards (fico: huge fraud), walk and bye bye underwater mortgage, fuck the banks. Hey,…it’s just a pragmatic family business decision. Got the idea from Wall Street too big to fail banks, sob’s got my Tarp money and all, so screw them. Start me a family weed/veggie garden, gunsNroses, pop me a cool one,…Oh and Fuck the Census!
February 24th, 2010 - 22:06
You can't. You would have to know American Law. Contact the American Bar Association. Call a law school in any state. Such as Pepperdine in California.
How can you practice American Law if you only know Egyptian law? lol Not going to get many clients here are you? lol
February 25th, 2010 - 02:01
That their free to astuff their throats with as many dicks as they want as long as I don't have to see it.
February 25th, 2010 - 02:12
You're going to need to get either a JD or LLM (if you already have a law degree from outside the US), and you'll need to pass the bar.
February 25th, 2010 - 09:49
Banks are frauds.
But did the Oval, Senate, House
in a cover up and a accessory to a National banking fraud scheme….
There all felons in the banks and Oval, Senate, and House.
February 25th, 2010 - 10:17
“My agency in promoting the passage of the National Banking Act was the greatest financial mistake in my life. It has built up a monopoly which affects every interest in the country.” -Salmon P Chase
“Putting Fiscal Year 2009s $9 trillion deficit another way, 17% of Americas private wealth, accumulated over a period of 235 years, was wiped out by just one years worth of government deficit spending insanity”. -Stewart Dougherty
February 25th, 2010 - 10:55
Part 2: “…The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” -Times of London editorial in response to US President Abraham Lincoln’s position that the USA create, issue and circulate its own currency
February 25th, 2010 - 06:54
No the trails, if they are from inclusive crimes, are all held together. The prosecutor may not decide to even charge with the misdemeanors. lets say the bad guy trespassed and then killed a victim. The prosecutor would not even go with the trespass, unless state law made the punishment higher for the killing if there was another crime.
In your example the charge of UUW is a lesser included offense to the armed robbery. They likely would be charged with the misdo but the trail would be at the same time, even if there were multiple victims, the bank, the teller and the customers.
If all the crimes happened at the same time then the trials for the lesser included offenses (i.e. shooting someone has the lesser included offense of an assault) or even separate misdemeanors (i.e. the bad guy robs victim A and on walking out slaps victim B), are all together.
If for example the crimes were separated by time, place and victim then the trials are separate, no matter if misdo or felony
February 25th, 2010 - 07:02
In a word, NO.
They only teach aspects of American law and court decisions (e.g., Sullivan v. The New York Times) in order to show a contrast with Canadian law.
A law degree in Canada will allow you to be recognized as a legitimate lawyer in Canada. It will be largely without value in the US.
February 25th, 2010 - 13:48
If I understand your question correctly, this should be of a lot of service. Its in PDF format, but it highlights many different facility influences in detail. Hope this helps.
February 25th, 2010 - 14:06
I've been in law enforcement for almost two decades. I have yet to use any aspect of the Patriot Act in my crime fighting endeavors. Much of what police encounter on a daily basis is dealt with using laws, case laws, policies, and practices that have been in use way before the Patriot Act. The left likes to scream Patriot Act anytime someone raises a question about law enforcement they don't agree with or understand. For example, post a question on here asking about warrantless vehicle searches and some uninformed person will surely start sobbing about the Patriot Act when in fact the question concerns the Carroll Doctrine. The Carroll Doctrine stems from a US Supreme Court ruling from the 1920's not the Patriot Act. I can talk about US v. Carroll until the proverbial cows come home and the Patriot Act sect will never listen.
February 25th, 2010 - 17:57
There are always advertisements for scholarships for UK graduates to do a post grad degree in the US. You should go to your university careers office for more information. Demand for these are very high from what I hear so be prepared for an interview and things like that