Copyright © 2010 Law and Attorney Guides · Powered by WordPress | Sitemap
Sponsored by: Lowongan Kerja Karir | Blog Atom! | Situs Iklan Baris Gratis | INDO Musik Go to top ↑
Sponsored by: Lowongan Kerja Karir | Blog Atom! | Situs Iklan Baris Gratis | INDO Musik Go to top ↑
August 22nd, 2009 - 12:27
You’re right we should just have left new orleans in chaos. and let a few local police try to keep control of a ruined crime filled city. YAYY ANARCHY!
August 22nd, 2009 - 13:05
For more information watch:
AD 2010
on youtube.
You are friendly invited to join the
league of those who know.
August 22nd, 2009 - 13:26
Not sure on the procedure for Australia but the U.S. is as follows:
To be eligible for the bar in the U.S. as a foreign attorney, a person must have completed 12-24 months of law school at an accredited law school in the U.S and obtained a J.D. (Jurist Doctor). The 12-24 months depends on if you have completed an LL.B. or an LL.M. in the U.K. The other prerequisites for the bar exam include a Professional Course with the state's Bar Association and completion of the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE), which a minimum score is needed to pass. The score depends on the State.
Once the above is completed you are then eligible to sit the Bar Exam in your chosen state and again, a minimum score is required to pass. Once you do pass, you then take the oath and apply to the licensing body of the state.
The only state in the U.S. which allows LL.B. holders to sit the bar exam is New York and thus, that is where many go, but you will still be a lawyer with an LL.B. in a J.D. world and will find difficulty in seeking employment and will not be eligible to work outside of the State of New York.
To apply to a law school in the U.S. you will need to take the LSAT (Law Schools Admission Test). The LSAT is only given four times a year (June, October, December and February) and it is possible to take the LSAT in the U.K.
With regards to your law degree in the U.K, when you apply to a law school in the U.S. you will submit your school transcripts for evaluation using the LSAC JD Credential Assembly Service. This is so that your foreign transcripts can be evaluated and the U.S. equivalence of them can be determined to see if you are eligible for law school and if you are, then which year of law school you will be entering.
Don't forget that to study in the U.S. at law school you will need an F1 (student) visa and another key note to remember is this; when you graduate with a J.D, pass all of the prerequisites for the bar, pass the bar exam, take the oath and are finally licensed, you will still not be legally permitted to work without the required H1B visa, for which a company must sponsor and petition you for.
Below are some links to help you.
August 22nd, 2009 - 13:33
these might help?
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/people/A0859499.html
http://www.historicaltextarchive.com/books.php?op=viewbook&bookid=36&cid=7 (maybe try http://www.historicaltextarchive.com/books.php?op=viewbook&bookid=36 too)
http://www.lva.lib.va.us/whoweare/exhibits/marshall/index.htm
good luck on the report =) sry, these sites probably won't help much…
August 23rd, 2009 - 00:57
We have a problem. But it’s not with the bill NJ passed. It’s with the young people in the gangs and even worse, doing their thing in the dark of night. If the police find it’s beyond their ability to control. To defend and protect from all enemies, foriegn and domestic. Then an armed militia just may be the answer we need. A few nights with groups of twenty or so armed militia walking those streets might just change a few minds about gun control too. But citizen militias first. Not the army.
August 23rd, 2009 - 02:26
New Jersey didn’t pass a curfew. They pased a bill that allows all communities in new jersey to pass one for their own town. And 32 municipalities already had one anyway. It isn’t martial law. In Paterson’s case, since there was so much mayhem in their streets at night. They want one to curb gang actions and lawlessness. I approve whole heartedly with your stance on guns. And almost wish we would all get together as militias in every town in trouble and just plain handle it.
August 23rd, 2009 - 03:36
August 23rd, 2009 - 04:28
You can't. You would have to know American Law. Contact the American Bar Association. Call a law school in any state. Such as Pepperdine in California.
How can you practice American Law if you only know Egyptian law? lol Not going to get many clients here are you? lol
August 23rd, 2009 - 05:19
No the trails, if they are from inclusive crimes, are all held together. The prosecutor may not decide to even charge with the misdemeanors. lets say the bad guy trespassed and then killed a victim. The prosecutor would not even go with the trespass, unless state law made the punishment higher for the killing if there was another crime.
In your example the charge of UUW is a lesser included offense to the armed robbery. They likely would be charged with the misdo but the trail would be at the same time, even if there were multiple victims, the bank, the teller and the customers.
If all the crimes happened at the same time then the trials for the lesser included offenses (i.e. shooting someone has the lesser included offense of an assault) or even separate misdemeanors (i.e. the bad guy robs victim A and on walking out slaps victim B), are all together.
If for example the crimes were separated by time, place and victim then the trials are separate, no matter if misdo or felony
August 23rd, 2009 - 10:58
Bring on martial law, I want these motherfuckers to step on my lawn…
August 23rd, 2009 - 11:00
And you won't. Scottish law applies to citizens of Scotland. We here in colonies have a whole bunch of new judicial precedents to rely on.
August 23rd, 2009 - 13:16
That their free to astuff their throats with as many dicks as they want as long as I don't have to see it.
August 23rd, 2009 - 15:12
If I understand your question correctly, this should be of a lot of service. Its in PDF format, but it highlights many different facility influences in detail. Hope this helps.
August 23rd, 2009 - 19:27
Religion should have had nothing to do with this government.
August 24th, 2009 - 01:29
Ok, if New Jersey is planning a curfew it’s a state government issue. There are things called different levels of government, checks and balances, and things of that nature. If these boundaries were crossed, you’d have some pissed offsenators and representatives noticing…stop being so damn crazy.
August 24th, 2009 - 01:44
ML is here my people get it together
August 24th, 2009 - 03:20
There is a part of the posse comitatus that most people don’t know. It’s the very first section that allows the local sherriffs, mayors, constables, etc to ask for and deputize any group of citizens they feel they need to enforce the law. Indeed they can actually require it. In other words temporarily draft you. That is why the second section forbids the army to police, unless an emergency is declared. The power exists for a militia to be created at any point needed. Nice. And very effective.
August 24th, 2009 - 05:35
I've been in law enforcement for almost two decades. I have yet to use any aspect of the Patriot Act in my crime fighting endeavors. Much of what police encounter on a daily basis is dealt with using laws, case laws, policies, and practices that have been in use way before the Patriot Act. The left likes to scream Patriot Act anytime someone raises a question about law enforcement they don't agree with or understand. For example, post a question on here asking about warrantless vehicle searches and some uninformed person will surely start sobbing about the Patriot Act when in fact the question concerns the Carroll Doctrine. The Carroll Doctrine stems from a US Supreme Court ruling from the 1920's not the Patriot Act. I can talk about US v. Carroll until the proverbial cows come home and the Patriot Act sect will never listen.
August 24th, 2009 - 05:58
Yes, I’m well aware of the difference in government levels. But even New Jersey as a state imposing a curfew on everyone for whatever reason is martial law.
Oh, and by the way, I’m not crazy…I’m fucking insane…madly insane. Either way, the senators and congressman don’t give a shit. They’re part of the problem here. There are no checks and balances anymore. Just look at the czars Obama has appointed. They answer to no one but Obama.
August 24th, 2009 - 13:49
Please, GOOGLE:
H1N1 and “Swine Flu Vaccine” and Squalene and “Cytokine Storm”
GOOGLE:
“Resettlement/Internment Specialists”
Look for GoArmy & National Guard website Job Ads.
See my page for additional information under recent activity and comments section.
Connect the dots.
Thanks.
August 24th, 2009 - 15:30
I cannot speak specifically to the Child Exploitation Material (CEM) situation in the US situation; but you have to realise that yes the internet is a big place, but more importantly it is a place without borders. Policing is limited to a jurisdiction.
What you will find is that more and more Law Enforcement Agencies are sharing information and more and more peddlers of CEM are being located and more importantly more producers of CEM are being located and prosecuted for both the trafficking of CEM as well as the contact offences being committed against children.
Ultimately the priority of investigators in this area is to identify and locate the children being abused so that they can be rescued. Yes catching those that trade the images is an added bonus but we have keep our focus on finding those children at risk.
just a little food for thought.
August 24th, 2009 - 20:01
Good points ftt, agreed. Gang punks are a major problem. Their numbers would quickly decline if armed militias patrolled the streets. The cops are affraid of them or just want to deal with them. Most cops would rather stop by the local 7-11 for free coffee or park car-to-car and bullshit. I see that in our city on a constant basis. That’s why the gangs in our city run rampid…law enforcement doesn’t enforce.
August 24th, 2009 - 21:00
There are always advertisements for scholarships for UK graduates to do a post grad degree in the US. You should go to your university careers office for more information. Demand for these are very high from what I hear so be prepared for an interview and things like that
August 25th, 2009 - 00:03
In a word, NO.
They only teach aspects of American law and court decisions (e.g., Sullivan v. The New York Times) in order to show a contrast with Canadian law.
A law degree in Canada will allow you to be recognized as a legitimate lawyer in Canada. It will be largely without value in the US.
August 25th, 2009 - 00:09
New Jersey is already considering a “curfew” on everyone. WTF? This is used in Martial Law. It’s beginning people. New jersey is an experiment by the Obama Administration and the DHS to see how it will pan out and how people will react. FEMA is also involved. Lock and load now, be prepared.
It’s happening people…believe it!
August 25th, 2009 - 01:59
No that is not true. But there are a lot of crazy laws on the books that make you scratch your head in amazement. In Ocean City NY it is illegal for a man to go out in public topless. In Topeka Kansas it's against the law to serve wine in teacups. Here is a website with other stupid laws:
http://tjshome.com/dumblaws.php
August 25th, 2009 - 03:44
People are abusing the gun amendment, and Bush was like a person who is almost going to put martial law or fascism
August 25th, 2009 - 05:33
August 25th, 2009 - 08:37
Jeferson said. For those who give up a freedom for the sake of,etc,etc. Yah. I get it. But you know what. They weren’t dealing with the crips, the bloods, any of the like kind hispanic gangs, or the level of lawlessness we find ourselves in today. But contray to his quote. I don’t think we need to give up any freedom. I think we need to reclaim the pose act I named already. Use that to it’s logical best conclusion, and move on. Elect police chiefs and sherrifs that think that way and use it.
August 25th, 2009 - 11:37
You don't say who "he" is but I suppose you're speaking about Obama and if he was really born in Kenya he would be an American citizen if his mother was but that also shows that he is a liar about something else.