Copyright © 2010 Law and Attorney Guides · Powered by WordPress | Sitemap
Sponsored by: Lowongan Kerja Karir | Blog Atom! | Situs Iklan Baris Gratis | INDO Musik Go to top ↑
Sponsored by: Lowongan Kerja Karir | Blog Atom! | Situs Iklan Baris Gratis | INDO Musik Go to top ↑
November 23rd, 2009 - 06:15
@davyjames You are right. There is some truth to what he says about automation etc., but I don’t think that mitigates the importance of humanity. Nor does it impact labor; it merely shifts labor. A service-driven labor simply requires different skill sets than an industrially driven one. Perhaps more education, which is why EDUCATION is so important to the economy, not necessarily labor itself.
November 23rd, 2009 - 06:24
i love the wire
November 23rd, 2009 - 09:28
You’re a disease.
November 23rd, 2009 - 10:03
ROFL. Look who cant notice that I shut up over 2 months ago. Fucking idiot.
November 23rd, 2009 - 06:21
Maybe this will help.
Communications Decency Act passed as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, (Title V)
Telecommunication Act of 1996, Public law No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996)
http://www.fcc.gov/telecom.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
November 23rd, 2009 - 07:47
New York State has such laws available on line. Your state's web site may also provide this or link to a .gov site that does. Some legal web sites also include state laws.
November 23rd, 2009 - 13:18
Also, hits are timed, so you can get pretty accurate information about how long people are on the page with your ad.
November 23rd, 2009 - 09:15
I found some good info here.
November 23rd, 2009 - 17:17
Brilliant Stuff!
November 23rd, 2009 - 23:29
wow look who cant shut the fuck up
November 24th, 2009 - 00:33
excellent work!
November 23rd, 2009 - 20:39
To answer you, the creation of Israel was not in breach of any international laws what so ever.The Jewish people base their claim to the Land of Israel on at least four premises: 1) the Jewish people settled and developed the land; 2) the international community granted political sovereignty in Palestine to the Jewish people; 3) the territory was captured in defensive wars and 4) God promised the land to the patriarch Abraham.Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.Nobody does Israel any service by proclaiming its 'right to exist.'
Israel's right to exist, like that of the United States, Saudi Arabia and 152 other states, is axiomatic and unreserved. Israel's legitimacy is not suspended in midair awaiting acknowledgement….
There is certainly no other state, big or small, young or old, that would consider mere recognition of its 'right to exist' a favor, or a negotiable concession.”
November 23rd, 2009 - 21:35
When Congress acts to aid a specific individual, family, or other small group, it passes a private law. Public laws, by comparison, deal with society as a whole. The first private bill, which was passed in September 1789, awarded 17 months' back pay to a military officer. Many other private bills that followed dealt with military pensions or claims of citizens whose property was damaged during wartime. Other private bills permitted specifically named foreigners to immigrate and become naturalized citizens of the United States. By 1900 private bills far outnumbered the public bills that Congress considered. Later, Congress turned settlement of most private claims over to the executive departments and enacted more comprehensive veterans' pensions and immigration laws that reduced the need to address them case by case. Legislation has also more narrowly defined the circumstances in which Congress will consider private claims. However, Congress continues to enact private laws to aid citizens who have been injured by government programs or who have appealed an executive agency ruling, such as one requiring the deportation of a noncitizen. Private laws are numbered separately from public laws. During the 102nd Congress, for example, they were numbered Private Law 102–1 and up. Public law is written to include all people.~~
November 24th, 2009 - 07:08
It’s a shame Simon doesn’t seem to understand economics, or why the economy gets worse. He seems to be confusing capitalism with people losing jobs which isn’t how it works. When he says people are “worth less” it isn’t really true, except possibly in the worst of the inner cities where politics has destroyed everything. In actual terms humans are worth more in terms of the assets we hold. A poor person today has a tv, a microwave, often a car, 100 years ago they’d be strugling for food.
November 24th, 2009 - 15:39
I live in Nebraska and to my knowledge, there is no such law.
However, the standard operating procedure is that a kid who turns 5 or 6 by October 15th is Kindergarten age. So the school would naturally enroll the child in kindergarten instead of preschool. The public preschools have limited spaces, so I'm sure they wouldn't put a 6-yr-old in preschool — that's way too big to be around 3- and 4-yr-olds anyway. The 6-yr-old should definitely go to kindergarten, as do most 5-yr-olds, although some are held back for a year.
If a 6-yr-old can't make it in kindergarten, that child probably has some sort of learning disabilities and should be evaluated and perhaps enrolled in a private school.
November 24th, 2009 - 16:34
Laws vary widely by not only state, but by municipality (city, town, village, etc.).
Rights are solely determined by the ability to finance a fight for the right to exercise those rights.
You can beat the rap if you have enough money, but you can't beat the ride, or the time and money you will spend defending that right.
A person only has the rights he can afford to defend. The police or local/state courts are not going to defend those rights if they are the ones violating those rights.
November 24th, 2009 - 22:03
@davyjames interesting point – I hadn’t heard about that . . . if it’s true I share your disappointment . . . though I imagine David emphasized the importance of news outlets that offer quality journalism. Thing is, I don’t think major newspapers qualify for that title . . . maybe he emphasized local news
November 24th, 2009 - 23:31
http://www.scn.org/~bk269/94-142.html
Check it out.
November 24th, 2009 - 23:37
Here is what I found for you.
http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_generic.jsp?cid=10115&id=5128
November 25th, 2009 - 09:15
There is journalism on the Internet. We need newspapers and their full services, but he doesn’t have it right about blogs.
We need robust newspapers and blogs.
November 25th, 2009 - 07:41
The best public law school in Florida in the University of Florida. It also happens to be the best overall law school in Florida. U.S. News and World Report ranks UF as the 47th best law overall law school in the United States.
Although #2 in Florida, Florida State University, is not too far behind. U.S. News ranks FSU as the 53rd best law school in the nation.
Hope I was able to help you out!
November 25th, 2009 - 11:26
I don't know if federal law dictates that, but I do know that any school that refuses federal funding is exempt from federal education laws.
November 25th, 2009 - 16:17
You learn things like what is allowed and what isn't! It is basically just learning what the laws and requirements of the state and country are! It is probably similar to government!
November 25th, 2009 - 18:26
In a criminal case, the action is brought by the government. The so-called "plaintiff" is the people. You'll see that a criminal action is titled "The People of (State) vs. (Defendant)." In a civil case, a private individual brings an action–in other words, sues–another private individual.
November 26th, 2009 - 00:11
November 26th, 2009 - 00:15
Because some states do allow you to opt in to others getting information. All states allow you to get your own information, and some allow it with the written permission of the owner. All the web pages want is the money for the search, they really don't care if it showed nothing, they did do the service and will get paid regardless.
The "B" part of the act says what information is available, and to whom. Generally it's law enforcement, tow companies with possession, and insurance companies with claims.
Some DMV's have a procedure where they will write to the person saying who is asking for their information and what is being asked, and ask if they want their information released upon getting a request, so sometimes they actually do get you the information, which allows them to stay in business.
If you notice, most of the web pages also claim to find unlisted numbers, or cell phone numbers, something else what is not available.
And even here, ask a question about getting a loan with bad credit to buy a new car, and watch the spammers come out in force.
November 26th, 2009 - 06:16
@davyjames yeah but there’s still a huge gap between rich and poor. There is still huge inequality. This should not be the case. Capitalism is the cause of this inequality.
November 26th, 2009 - 16:14
that fat idiot giving the intro needs a bottle thrown at his head
November 26th, 2009 - 16:16
I was disappointed to see David Simon testifying to congress about the decline of newspapers or something. I wouldn’t have thought somebody who’d written the wire would think that politics was anything more than completely morally bankrupt. The idea he’d want those same people legislating newspapers shocked me.
November 26th, 2009 - 17:11
David Simon is a genius. He has broken the boundaries of Television. “The Sopranos” was a great show, very poetical. However “The Wire” cleverly depicts a certain realism which has never been so portrayed so unbiasedly and fair. To me David Simon is more than a “writer” or a “journalist”. He is a humanist and dare I say it a socialist(Back off conservatives, lol). Above all he is a great speaker and I hope due to his position of power he can pass the baton to new upcoming talent.